Causes of
Unemployment
There are 4 headings for the different forms of unemployment;
frictional, cyclical (demand deficient), real wage and structural.
Real wage
(aka classical) unemployment occurs when demand and supply
aren’t equal. Therefore it is a disequilibria issue. This can occur if the
wages demanded by the labour force are higher than the amount that industry is
willing to pay. Hence classical unemployment can occur through government intervention
(by establishing minimum prices; in the UK the national minimum wage is an
example of a policy which can lead to classical unemployment), trade unions
bargaining for higher wages or reserve wages (a limit set by employees as to
how much they wish to earn to accept a job offer). If workers refuse employment
because they aren’t offered their reserve wage then they are voluntarily unemployed.
Cyclical
unemployment occurs because labour is a derived demand, if there is a
deficiency in aggregate demand then the derived demand for the production of
goods and services will fall, leading firms to make redundancies. Labour is a
lagging economic indicator because during cyclical unemployment firms won’t
immediately reduce their work force in spite of a fall in demand. This is
because they don’t know how long the downturn will last and it is costly to
fire a workforce, to simply rehire one and have to train the up a few weeks
later (if that is the case), therefore managers hold on to their trained and
experienced workers until they are sure that demand is going to be suppressed
for a great period of time. Some firms may even decide to keep on their
workforce during a period of time of suppressed demand if they can afford to do
so and the workforce is suitable trained and experienced to make themselves
vital for the firm.
Seasonal
unemployment could also come under this heading; it occurs when workers
are only required during certain periods of the year/business cycle, for
example retail workers may be required during the busy trading period of
Christmas, or some farmers may only be needed during harvest to help collect
the produce.
Frictional
unemployment always occurs and happens when workers leave a job, and are
technically unemployed, whilst they search for another job. They may decide to
leave for personal reasons, or because they want to find a better job with
higher pay/perks, or it may be because they have been laid off, also new
workers entering the labour force are considered frictionally unemployed whilst
they come to terms with the labour market. Imperfect information can increase
frictional unemployment if unemployed members of the labour force are unaware
of the existence of jobs.
Structural
unemployment can occur due to capital-labour substitution (workers are
replaced by machines, hence they are no longer needed) or due to a long run
(permanent) decline in demand in the sector in which they work. This can be a
problem of occupational and geographical immobility; workers may not be in the
place where the jobs are, or may not have the skills and training to do the
required work.
Hysteresis is the
theory that a period of high unemployment (usually caused by demand deficiency)
can lead to an increase in the value of NAIRU. That is high unemployment now
can cause high unemployment in the future. The reason for this is that
unemployment has long term effects (as well as the short term effect of not
having an income other than unemployment benefits) in that workers forget their
skills and as they aren’t practising them they may deteriorate or at least not
improve at the rate they would have done had they been in employment.
Furthermore some people may become so disillusioned with the labour market that
they leave it completely and remain unemployed perpetually.
Additionally hysteresis can also occur because after a
negative shock, there are fewer workers who may decide to collectively bargain
(in the form of a union) for higher wages. These higher wages will then keep
out new workers in the future as the firm has less money to spend on new
workers.
Relationships
between unemployment, economic growth
Okuns Law
Okuns law is the relationship between losses in an economies
productivity and unemployment. It is considered a rule of thumb, for every 1%
fall in a countries unemployment rate, GDP will be operating at 2% below
potential GDP.
An empirical study has shown that unemployment is largely inversely
related to the rise in GDP growth (economic growth) as shown in the graph
below.
Okuns law can be used to tell us how much output (GDP) can be
lost when unemployment is above its natural rate. Output is related to
unemployment because the labour force is a function of output.
To keep unemployment at a steady rate GDP needs to grow at
the rate that productive capacity is growing. So if the PPF curve is shifting
rightwards due to an improvement in the quality or quantity of a factor of
production (normally increases in productivity are a factor causing an outward
shift of the PPF curve), then GDP has to increase at the same rate in order to
keep unemployment steady (note however that even if GDP is below this, jobs may
still be created, but it also implies that the labour force is increasing at a
faster rate and hence unemployment will persist). Therefore to reduce
unemployment, GDP is needed to grow at a faster rate than the potential growth
(if it utilised all available factors of production) of an economy.
Jobless
growth occurs when there is economic growth but employment levels
continue to fall or at least remain constant. Proposed reasons are increased
productivity – this can lead to higher output without the need to increase
employment – and automation, leading to growth without the need for increased
employment.
Under
employment occurs when workers are employed only part time.
Statistically they show up as employed, however they may not be working as many
hours as they wish because they cannot find employment to do so.
Economic
myopia occurs when firms under invest in capital and labour because
they have a poor (or unfounded) estimation of long run demand in the economy.
In order words they have a short-sighted take on investment based on investment
now.
Page last updated on 15/04/14
|